'Theme: Gender Stereotyping Essay\r'

'Based on the novel, The Curse by lee Su Ann, I bear acquired an interesting theme from the more others that rush been represent in the accounting. The theme is sexual activity stereotyping, in which, involves unfair treatment upon the rights of a trusted grammatical gender requiring them to act in a trustpricey manner, where it is greatly influenced by culture and upbringing. There ar a few unfortunate founts in the reputation who have been condemned to such discrimination and in this story; the female gender faces the dilemma of being subjected to gender stereotyping.\r\nThe first character is Siti, Puan Kamsiah’s 17 category old fille. She is a student about in the course of taking her SPM but we have seen in the story where Siti monologues about having to ask a teacher at school to persuade her suffer to let sit for the exam. Traditionally, the female stereotypic role is to get married early, be obedient and submissive and Siti, like either other woman bef ore her, is required to comply the customs and norms. This shows that in that society, women, in general, have no say in their lives especially for someone as young as Siti. Siti was likewise portrayed to have felt a melodic theme of envy towards Azreen who was well-heeled enough to have furthered her studies overseas, in London, while she is mum shaky on taking her SPM. Opinion provided, her father’s role in making decisions may well ruin the possibility of a impudent future as mentioned in the book where Siti is in truth a hard-working student who loves to study.\r\nSecondly, the character Madhuri is the consummate(a) pic of how gender stereotyping may ruin someone’s life and in her case, it took away her life. Madhuri as portrayed in the novel is the perfect example of a woman who possesses the deportment requirements and is considered innocent by the small townrs finished her soft spoken ways. She can teach Qu’ran lessons to the children of the village and she can cook very well as seen when Azreen’s mother asks for the porridge Madhuri made. Madhuri also obliges her father’s manipulative orders to marry Haji Ghani despite having the flutters for another. Additionally, Madhuri takes apportion of her parents even after her marriage to Haji Ghani.\r\nAs a reader, I have seen how this traded in the look of Azreen when she finds out the truth regarding her sister’s finale and secret love affair to Asraf. Madhuri’s character takes a big leap in change and naturally becomes her facade to cover up for the forbid affair that she had entangled herself into. She is no longer the perfect idol for women to follow and men to like and this tune led to her demise. In my opinion, her naivety to confess her consecutive heart led to the adulteration of her shortcomingless spirit which was graspd by the ignorant and self-righteous villagers. When her egoistic father discovered the truth, he had killed he r in unruly rage, not being able to accept his daughter loving other than her own husband.\r\nLastly, gender stereotyping is visualized through and throughout the novel, in the main character Azreen through the aspect of female behaviourism. This statement is further be when Azreen’s school friends start to aver wary eyes towards her when she behaves unlady-like. She plays hockey with the boys and even â€Å"laughs like a bunch of hyenas” with them. To them, as a woman, Azreen is not expect to be tomboyish and hangs too closely with boys. She is also considered obstinate and rude by the villagers and her own parents when she chooses to plow her mind rather than remain silent which is against the norms of the villagers as shown in various occasions in the novel, namely, the shite incident where she takes the blame for Asraf out of loyalty in friendship. In my opinion, Azreen’s unladylike and outspoken behaviour has triggered a sense of discomfort among the people or so her as she does behave in the stereotyped manner, where they perceive her as disrespecting the elderly.\r\nPeople tend to be cast out when they don’t follow plastered norms of a society. This is evident in the reasons that I have stated. In my opinion, Lee Su Ann has shown perfectly how narrow-minded view can lead to detrimental outcomes. These sorts of stereotypes can put forward harmful; they can stifle individual side and creativity, as well as hinder individualized and professional growth.\r\nAdditional point:\r\nPuan Fatihah.\r\nIn the sense of a woman having to marry and produce offspring, Puan Fatihah is seen as someone who has failed this. She is incapable of bearing her husband a child and always feels insecure about herself. This flaw renders her nearly useless in her husband’s eyes when she is unable to fulfill her duty as wife. I can understand her pain of danger as she looks into the mirror and see her unstoppable maturation face. Mean while, Hj Ghani the insensitive husband marries another woman, Madhuri, who is by both(prenominal) men and women’s standards beautiful.\r\nWe have seen how much the villagers adore her flawless personality and beauty and Hj Ghani, despite a wise man, also falls for the stereotyped mind set. Pn Fatihah’s declining beauty has caused her to feel envy towards Madhuri and to be angry at her husband. However, it is not her disruption, but rather, the fault of the villagers who use the subject of beauty to measure the worth of a woman. How sure you are that it was not Hj Ghani who is unornamented? Madhuri, the second wife, also did not produce a child for him before her untimely death.\r\n'