Obama’s Foreign Policy on China

chairman Barack Obama and his systems orthogonal policy toward china merchant ship be summed up in one word conciliatory. Conciliatory is not in the form of either weakness or appeasement, precisely rather the realisation that in the 21st century global market, china is a chief(prenominal) player on the terra firma stage. Obamas overseas policies are a departure from the previous judicial system. George Bushs unilateral foreign policies were deemed domineering, unconstipated belligerent.From an international standpoint, Anti-the Statesn sentiments were at an each-time high during Iraqi struggle driven years. In America, the domestic stance after 9/11 saw this as an extension of patriotism and commitment. Nowadays, both domestic entirelyy and internationally, many other(prenominal) pundits would argue that Obamas policy record in china inspires apply and optimism. President Obama is acknowledging the fact of a much to a greater extent multipolar macrocosm exist s where America rear endnot take all of the curbership roles by itself. Yet, at the same time, the world cannot go send on with forbidden America.In this respect, mainland china implys a wide forthright market where they can export all their manufactured goods to consumers worldwide. Thus, it is a coarse benefit for chinaware to contain good international relations with new(prenominal) societies to acquire raw materials and sell products to oerseas companies. President Obamas policies toward china reflect a forward marching multilateral approach that deliberates an oppose level playing field in terms of economic opportunities so that not one ground can monopolize or engage the global market.There is a thin line when it comes to economic diplomacy and armed services comportment, so in regards to the currency value of the Chinese Yuan/Renminbi, the Obama administration has used strategic requests to the World Trade Organization and join Nations to mandate chinaware o n purposely keeping their currency low. These formal accusations were discussed previous(predicate) this year between President Obama and President Hu Jintao. There has been a consensus among the world leaders to use mean(a) trading practices to attention benefit all the countries especially in the delicate market of Asia Pacific.In this regards, even though the touch on is controversial, President Obama has ramped up legions presence in the Pacific to intrinsic law the trade waters and to secure areas where at that place were less American presence in previous years. These movements constitute alarmed chinaware and Japan in particular yet with the WTO and UN backing well-nigh of the ensurements, Obama is hoping China welcomes some of the military help not as a threat to Chinas national posts solely a welcomed ally to settle any dis spuees in international waters with the recent troubles with Japan and other constituental issues that arise.President Obama verbalize t hat he was pleased to see the still rise of China and hoped to slip away to support China in its currency upshots to ensure a more balanced way of doing commerce. (US Policy 2012) In May of this year, China let the renminbi hit a low of 0. 9 exchange value versus the dollar. China contends the economy was slowing sharply thus had no choice entirely to try to boost its exports as a way of mending some of the bleeding (NYTimes May, 2012) This has caused much headache for the United States because its trade deficit with China has gone over $290 billion dollars last year.The Obama administration has pressed toughened for three years to let the renminbi to appreciate at a swift rate than it has been. Europe overly has had some struggles with this fact because for China morose the currency brooks for competitive trade in exports but brings up the address for imports so in that respect is less competition inside China so its citizens benefit while other countries do not. In any case, Obama is nerve-wracking to build lasting bridges of mutual respect so that in the long run, the peaceful rise go away end with a peaceful future.In a sense, I believe every field must benefit its own interests ahead of the world to secure its citizens every benefit that is cognize to man. But, on the other side, without a world, it is hard for a country to sop up the benefits of trade if everyone additions tariffs or lowers their currency. This is a double-edge sword that does not suck an calorie-free expiration solution so I understand both sides and that no country is living in a vacuum. There are a quite a a bit of complexities and consequences to consider and I believe there get out be a mutual achiever in this issue.Concerning Human Capital, the Obama presidency has too pressed hard to improve the benevolent race rights issues in China in terms of economic policies to benefit workers and their family situations. Historically, having the highest population at a staggering figure of over $1. 3 billion people, the human tug supply is more than available at any given moment. Thus, United States especially has outsourced countless manufacturing companies and jobs to China. This reality the President clearly stated get out not change anytime in the future so this must be an accepted reality. (Ivaneishvili 2012) So, he Obama administration has sharply criticized China for their lack of enforcement and laws to carry on with such violations. But, this criticism as the State Department states applies to the United States as well, but the United States has laws to deal with this issues so the criticism is being put in a way not to outfight offend Chinese policies but to encourage an increase in the priority of the Chinese governance to follow up actions to remedy the situation (Berg 2012). The State Department also applauded China for the actions that China already has taken to ensure better running(a) conditions and labor rates.This issu e hurts at the heart of any country because human capital affects the very lives each person is trying to save. The truth of the matter in my opinion is that every country does have gross human rights issues. The problems in China are magnified and pressed by closely countries because of the sheer number of human labor that exists in China. Thus, as China continues to rise and become an economic super reason as it is becoming, those concerns will be dealt with because the people inside will and cannot stand for harsh living conditions.But, this is also the crux of the matter because if the people inside working in those factories do not care, how will the bosses ever face the truth and do something nigh it. Moreover, the Chinese government must also take steps to allow unions to form and protest to go on even though that great power be against the government itself. As long as peaceful protests are taking place, a mutually healthy society with certain liberties will allow for bet ter conditions all around. The sanctions or false accusations only lead to more difficult climate for genuine diplomacy to take place.The Obama tribunal has done their outdo to limit some of the criticisms, instead, suggesting some ideas and working out plausible solutions to ensure the embassies on the ground in China can be an instrument to help both sides make the right judgments and calls on the spot for every situation that may arise (Berg 2012). Countries are going to continue to outsource jobs into China because of such cheap labor. In this sense, Americans can obtain ever increasingly cheaper products while China gains more jobs for its citizens.I do not see any reason for not forming better semipolitical allies in this respect. Lastly, there has been heated contention on the political issues vis-a-vis North Korea, Iran, and Taiwan that affect the globe economically. President Obama and his administration have recently sanctioned some banks in China that have allegedly us ed to fund certain radical Muslim groups and Persian nuclear proliferation aims. The Chinese government certainly denies any wrongdoing on the part of the government and so that is not the issue (NYTimes 2012).There is no interrogation China and India have become large consumers of oil and natural resources over the last few years have shifted the market that oil and char producers desperately needed (Chang 2012). Iran and the Middles due east supply most of the oil for China while America has supplied a lot of the coal for China. The rate of increase is at a huge figure of 8% a rump growth. That is a huge supply. This type of consumption has been a blessing for many number of countries including the United States so the Obama Administration on these terms are delicate to file complaints on behalf of International Labor Unions, but he has to his credit.On the other hand, many countries including China appreciate American presence but not American intervention. To connect to deu ce issues, some of Chinas unilateral policies with these countries affect national security and oil prices in America. Thus, the two are irrevocably tied together. It is not only China but Russia as well. The State Department has taken certain measures to cut the monetary resource of certain groups or countries that have ties to terrorist organizations and nuclear goals. North Korea has been one of the countries that China seems to be passive towards.President Obama has been careful to be too unilateral or assertive in these matters but with the recent change in power in North Korea and the upcoming elections in Iran, there is a vested interest in the Obama administration to secure a more peaceful region in Asia and the Middle East. The purpose of terror is to disable and terrorize western sandwich populations as a whole so the pressure from Americans and other westbound countries to secure the Middle East has set a fire to Obamas more multilateral approach (Obama 2012).The resear ch is not there for an easy explanation for these events and situations. I can see why China continues to have relationships with Russia and Iran. I can also speculate why the continued help to North Korea. Most of these countries do sit right on the resile of China so that reason is obvious to keep your friends close and enemies closer, but that is just it. I do feel they are enemies of China rather mutual partners. I think this is what America and Obama worries about. I believe the best ways to go about this for both countries are for more innocent policies without fine print.Relationships cannot be built on lies and deception and in my fair and balanced view, there has been plenty of that from both sides, so it is important to be transparent and open in the discussions to help liberty and economic success to grow. In this way, a peaceful China and peaceful Middle East helps everyone prosper. In conclusion, President Obama and his administration have embarked on a incompatible path from the previous administration because of the new world order that we all face in the world. Conciliatory as a method for foreign policy has been an effective means to not isolate one country over another.In other terms, using multilateral agreements and combined pressures have do progress in China. I believe one taste of liberty, any person or group cannot wait for more so as China grows economically, it is the best interest of both countries to help one another in terms of currency, human rights, and political allies incidentally natural resources. The growth of China in recent years has been tremendous and there is so much room for it to grow more. Internally, Obama has repeated that the people in China as consumers need to consume more (US Policy 2012).This goes without formula and I believe that is happening in China. President Barack Obama is up for re-election and I am not sure who is going to win but there have been pretty strong words in regards to China and foreig n policy so this paper is an interesting and important topic of study. The economic expert writes Chasing the Anti-China Vote as an article to speak of the elections. But, I happen to agree with Obama that outsourcing and manufacturing in China is there to stay so the way forward is not unilateral changes or demands. I believe China does need Americas presence in the pacific as a police figure to help.It is similar to the situations at the turn of the 20th century. China did not accept then, and I do not believe China will accept now but surely, there will have to be some compromises made on each side and I for one look forward to healthier and brighter future for both populations since I am a product of both.Works Cited Berg, Rebecca. In Meetings, U. S. Presses Beijing on Rights. The refreshed York Times. The new-fashioned York Times, 26 July 2012. Web. 17 Oct. 2012. . Chang, Gordon G. How China Will Restructure the cover Market. Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 24 June 2012. Web. 7 O ct. 2012. . Chasing the Anti-China Vote. The Economist. The Economist modernspaper, n. d. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. . Obama immaterial Policy philosophy Preparing America to Succeed in Multipolar World IVANEISHVILI journal of Social Sciences. Obama Foreign Policy Doctrine Preparing America to Succeed in Multipolar World IVANEISHVILI Journal of Social Sciences. N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. . Obamas Rudderless China, Russia Policy. a Global Public Square. N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. . Remarks By President Obama to the Australian Parliament. The White House. N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. . Research. , Jane Perlez Bree Feng Contributed. DIPLOMATIC memorandum Political Worries in U. S. and China Color Obama Aides Beijing Visit. The New York Times. The New York Times, 26 July 2012. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. . Shanghai. , Keith Bradsher Xu Yan Contributed Research From. China Lets Its Currency Depreciate. The New York Times. The New York Times, 01 June 2012. Web. 17 Oct. 2012. . USPolicy. Obama and Chinese Vice President Xi Before Their Meeting. N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. .