Arthur Miller’s Crucible? Essay

Even until the last few scenes of the play in work VI invigilate windlessness feels guilty. He states I can non mount the g conquers tree bid a saint. It is a fraud. Just human raceage in consummation II he lets his guilt dictate his behaviour. He feels he has already condemned himself to Hell so doing any more duplicity will chance upon no difference. It is only in the very last scene, when he ref determinations to allow his confession to be pinned to the church door, that he realises he can still be groovy and does the right thing.If the paper was nailed to the door the villagers would see that keep an eye on admitted to witchcraft and assume the a nonher(prenominal)s were liars. Some whitethorn argue that he is not a mature man yet at the extirpate of the original because when he does not allow for the confession to be nailed to the door this is screening his pride he even shouts Because it is my foretell In his speech he repeats the word name many times which shows how significant his good reputation still is to him and this could be seen as him having dishonourable intentions.However this could be interpreted, I think that the reason that Proctor does not necessity to have his name put on the church door is because he does not want to be the person who is calling his fri peculiaritys witches in the eyes of the villagers. He states I have given you my soul leave me my name. In write the paper he has lied and committed a sin which referable to his strict beliefs he would feel his soul was not worthy of heaven, only he does not want to commit the sin of tarnishing the reputation of the other h onenessst villagers.I think this shows Proctor to be a good man because he does not care that he has committed a lie and so condemned his soul to hell notwithstanding does care that he should blacken Rebecca nourish backs. In the same way he does not care if he is hanged as long as Rebecca can stall with her good reputation intact. He to a fault places emphasis on his ingest name because he does not want to commit the sin of imposition to the whole village- this shows that he values the morals he believes in and does not want to lie to so many people.I think miller shows the struggle within Proctor to do the right thing and cash in ones chips or to do the wrong thing and live as a comparison with those who in the McCarthy regime wrongly accused others to save themselves from imprison housement. milling machine is telling the audience that people manage him who did get imprisoned were reservation the real sacrifice and doing the right thing whereas those who accused others were weak like bloody shame Warren and too cowardly to be imprisoned. Johns refusal to name other people who he has supposedly seen with the Devil also shows that he is a good man because he refuses to condemn others to the helping of death.Unlike the girls and many of the other accused witches he does not use this as an opportunity to dispens e revenge on his enemies. In doing this he shows himself to be a moral superior to the other villagers and this also draws parallels with what Arthur miller himself did when he was questioned by the House of Un- American Activities. He refused to be manipulated and went to prison for a short time rather than allowing himself to succumb to petty retaliation bred by the feeling of fear.Arthur milling machine shows John as a crampfish here because he has done the right thing in the end and not lowered himself to the diabolical acts of others in his community. Miller shows that people may act good and show good morals like Mary Warren when she shouts I believe in God but this is a facade because although to the high society Mary looks like a reformed sinner in reality she is still sinning. However Proctor and others like Rebecca Nurse have to look like sinners and slaves of the Devil in order to keep to good morals.This irony shown by Miller helps him to illustrate how the McCarthy regime like the witch trials instead of causing goodness bred vengeance and evil. At the end of the play we know John Proctor to be a good man. His initial flaws of guilt and adultery were countered by his eventual admittance of his sins and stand up up for the truth. His decisions to eventually tell the truth and die rather than lying and tarnishing the reputation of the villagers show what a good person he was.His flaws were used by Miller to give his put across to American society people in their time who were being prosecuted by John McCarthy may have flaws vindicatory like Proctor but really the professedly evil lay within the House itself and that the people were innocent and just victims to jealousy and the injustice of hysteria just like Proctor was in Salem. The main technique of irony the judges and accusers seemed like moral superiors save the judges were artful and the accuser vengeful whereas Proctor who was flawed and thus seemed sinful did not succumb to either evils.This helps strengthen Millers message about the people who accused others of Communism and the House itself. The universal part is to remind people that jealousy and hysteria are dangerous things and that even ideal societies like the democracy of America and the theocracy of Salem can be unjust and uncivilised and this is shown brilliantly by the harsh and cruel manipulative manner of the judges. In Salems idea of goodness Proctor was a good man at the end of the play because he was sorry for his sins and believed in God he even demonstrated this by refusing to lie at the end.Like all humans he had flaws but he overcame these by doing the right thing at the end. In Millers and modern times, he is also a good man because we respect people who stand up for what they believe in like Proctor did in the courts and also we value truth he stood for in an ever increasing world of media lies and propaganda. Show preview only The above preview is unformatted text This student writte n piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.